|
|
|
|
Lean Enterprise
|
||
|
Over the past 30 years, we were led to believe that
computerized systems would provide the solution to all of our growth
and profit challenges. Material Requirements Planning (MRP) and
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System gurus assured us that if
we implemented their software programs the bottom-line would take
care of itself. Well it hasn’t happened!
Like most perceived panaceas, each of these programs received a lot
of hype, produced a few success stories but in general, contributed
little towards helping companies identify and achieve their full
growth and profit potential. For
a measure of their shortcomings, one needs only to spend some time
in an MRP scheduled manufacturing facility – especially during the
last weeks of the final financial quarter. In a typical company,
you’ll find that converting the quarterly financial forecast into
reality still requires overtime, internal/external expediting, last
minute “on-the-run” product changes and even a little “smoke
and mirrors”. Results are scrap, rework and warrantee costs that
negatively impact profitability
and quality and shipment problems that deliver less than
acceptable customer satisfaction. Companies
have spent many thousands of dollars in pursuing MRP and ERP only to
see their growth and profits decline due to uncontrolled operating
costs that produced non-competitive pricing. So, after introducing MRP/ERP computer systems and more, why is it
that most businesses are still struggling to sustain profitable
growth and are no where close to achieving their full growth and
profit potential? The
first reason is simple – the results achieved by any computer
system are only as good as the people at the controls and the
integrity of the data they provide. The second is complex – most
manufacturing managers facing major day-to-day problems and
constraints adopt a totally reactive management style. Consequently,
their time is consumed with “band-aiding” and/or finding ways to
work around system and process problems – leaving them little or
no time to analyze and eliminate the root causes of ineffective
systems and processes. How does one turn around such a classic
“cart before the horse” syndrome? What’s required is first a
company-wide, in-depth understanding of the fundamental of lean
manufacturing and then a total commitment to the consistent and
tenacious execution of lean manufacturing
basics. Like
Vince Lombardi, who achieved success by having his team focus on the
mastery of football basics – we need to have our manufacturing
teams focus on the mastery of
lean manufacturing
principles and techniques.
These basics require proactive planning and tenacious execution that
demands leadership above and beyond just satisfying “day-to-day”
accountabilities. Some managers can’t envision the benefits of
mastering manufacturing
basics, other simply can’t
find the time. Like practicing blocking and tackling in football,
it’s not exciting, and like most football heroes, managers prefer
to run with the ball. But without the tenacious and flawless
execution of lean manufacturing basics, companies will seldom achieve their full growth and profit
potentials. Delineated below are the key basics of lean
manufacturing: Information
Integrity:
It is not uncommon for front office
management to become disenchanted with computerized systems results
when time schedules and promised paybacks are not achieved. Truism:
acceptable systems results cannot be achieved when systems are
driven by inaccurate data and untimely, uncontrolled documentation. Performance
Management:
Measurement systems can be motivational or de-motivational. The
individual goal setting of the 80’s is a good example of
de-motivational measurement - it tested one individual or group
against the other and while satisfying some individual egos, it
provided little contribution to overall company growth and profit.
Today, the balanced scorecard is the choice of manufacturing
winners. Sequential Production:
It takes more than systems sophistication for manufacturing
companies to gain control of factory operations. To achieve on-time
shipments at healthy profit margins, companies need to replace
obsolete MRPII/ERP shop scheduling methodology with the simplicity
of sequential production. Manufacturing leaders have replaced their
MRP shop order "launch and expedite" methodology with
continuous production lines that are supported by real-time, visual
material supply chains … sequential production. The assertion that
sequential production only works in high production,
widget-manufacturing environments is a myth. Point-Of-Use-Logistics: Material
handling and storage are two of manufacturing’s high cost,
non-value added supply
chain management activities. The elimination of the stock room, as it
is known today, should be a strategic objective of all
manufacturers. Moving production parts and components from the
stockroom to their production point of use is truly a return to
basics and a significant cost reducer. Cycle
Time Management: Long
cycle times are symptoms of poor manufacturing performance and high
non-value added costs. Manufacturers need to focus on the continuous
reduction of all cycle times. Achieving success requires a specific
management style that focuses on “root cause” proactive problem
solving, rather than “fire-fighting.” Production
Linearity: Companies
will never achieve their full profit potential if they produce more
than 25% of their monthly shipment plan in the last week of the
month or more than 33% of their quarterly shipment plan in the last
month of the quarter. How linear do your production
departments produce to the company's master schedule? As
companies struggle to remain competitive, one of the strategies by
which gains in speed, quality and costs can be achieved is to form
teams of employees to pursue and achieve linear production. Resource Planning: One of the major challenges
in industry today is the timely right sizing of operations. Profit
margins can be eroded by not taking timely downsizing actions and
market windows can be missed and customers lost by not upsizing the
direct labor force in a timely manner. These actions demand timely,
tough decisions that require accurate, well-timed and reliable
resource information. Customer Satisfaction: Customer satisfaction is in the eyes of the beholder – the customer. Perceptions are what we need to address when it comes to improving customer satisfaction. It does us no good to have the best products and services if the customer’s perception of our ”as received" quality and service is unsatisfactory. We need to plan and implement proactive projects that breakdown the communication barriers that create invalid customer perceptions. While many business gurus have identified one or more of these manufacturing basics as important to the successful pursuit of business excellence, the fundamental importance of these lean manufacturing basics has been lost in the proliferation of buzz words and the mania of systems sophistication. We say it is time for companies to put a hold on sophisticated systems development that cause self-inflicted, day-to-day chaos. In its place, they should immediately initiate an action learning program for gaining a company-wide understanding and acceptance of the importance of the basics of lean manufacturing. Once buy-in and commitment have been achieved, aggressive planning and tenacious implementation must follow. In short, let’s put the “horse before the cart” – such a program will build a solid foundation for redefining and revitalizing a company’s pursuit of profitable growth. About the Author: Bill Gaw is the founder of Business Basics, LLC and a "been there, done that" lean enterprise advocate. He is the developer of six e-training packages and seven e-training modules published to help individuals and companies reach their full growth and earning potentials. |
||
|
| ||