How to improve
Computer Systems Performance

July 30, 2008 

Hi MBBP Subscribers, 

If your company is not receiving the benefits promised by the computer salesmen, I'll bet that the cause is neither hardware nor software design.  

My experiences have found that a lack of information integrity is usually the root cause of poor systems performance. Timely and accurate information provide the foundation for good decision making; and timely and accurate data provide the foundation for positive system results. MRP "take action" nervousness is almost always caused by inaccurate and untimely data inputs. 

If your company is struggling with poor systems performance, be sure to read this weeks article, "The Root Cause of Poor System Performance."

The article appears below.

Have a nice day, and stay connected.

  

Bill Gaw

Business Basics, LLC
6003 Dassia Way
Oceanside, CA 92056
bg@bbasicsllc.com 
760-945-5596

THE ROOT CAUSE OF
POOR SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 

MRPII/ERP System objectives cannot be achieved when day-to-day production and manufacturing control systems are driven by inaccurate, untimely and uncontrolled data and/or documentation. 

If your company is typical, you'll find that converting The monthly financial forecast into reality still requires overtime, costly expediting, expensive "on-the-run" product changes and even a little "smoke and mirrors." With all the available sophisticated computerized systems, why is it so? 

The answer lies in what's missing and has nothing to do with the quality of the system designs. Like Vince Lombardi, who focused his team on the mastering of football basics ... we need to focus our teams on the mastering of business basics. 

INFOTEGRITY 

There are Eight-Basics of Kaizen Based Lean Manufacturing, but when it comes to improving systems performance,” Information Integrity" is the most important. We call it KBLM Basic #001, "Infotegrity"... the ability to communicate data and documentation completely, accurately and in a timely manner.  

Like blocking and tackling in football, it's not Glamorous and few want to do it, but without a tenacious continuous improvement effort, information integrity will never be optimized and relevant systems will produce marginal results

A CASE IN POINT 

Infotegrity is crucial to computerized master scheduling and MRP computations. Excessive MRP rescheduling of released orders is costly and disruptive and is usually driven by poor input data. To improve the quality of MRP "rescheduling" messages, one materials manager focused onimproving the integrity of MRP inputs.  She reduced the frequency of their MRP "regeneration" and implemented a mandatory weekly review/purge/reset of all purchase and production "open" order status.  

The results were amazing; reschedule messages were reduced by 85% and her planner/buyers gained time to do additional proactive parameter maintenance. Because of increased scheduling stability, there was a significant improvement in both supplier and shop “on time” deliveries, (87% TO 98%) 

THE MRP PARAMETER CHALLENGE 

A good example of the importance of Infotegrity is the "eye-opening" result of the cumulative effect of data inputs in a computerized order release and scheduling system such as MRP. There are at least ten data input files that drive such systems with data accuracy indexes varying between 90% and 100%. Statistically, their cumulative effect (the product of their values) could yield a devastating, order release accuracy of 68.2 percent. That translates into a cumulative 31.8percent error rate in the order release and scheduling process. In spite of this huge constraint, American ingenuity and energy still gets the job done ... but at what costs? 

Although many business gurus have identified data Accuracy as important in the implementation of computerized systems, their message has been lost in the mania of systems sophistication. To remain competitive in the future, manufacturers must improve the results gained from their business systems investments ... to do this, the fine-tuning of Infotegrity is a "must do." How do companies Accomplish this task?  

SOME OF THE “HOW TOs” 

Here are a few of their techniques:

• Simplify data bases - making it easy and routine to keep data correct and up to date.

• "Bulletproof" system parameter maintenance - helping to eliminate mistakes.

• Streamline and discipline the product documentation process - doing it right the first time.

• Real time auditing and corrective actions keeping information current and correct.

• Employ the right tools - point-of-use logistics, back-flushing, and the Internet.

• Establish the right mindset ... the quality of decision-making is dependent on Infotegrity.

THE COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT 

Competition is getting tougher and tougher as each year passes. If we don't want our competitors to close in on our markets, we need to continuously improve product/service quality, increase productivity, lower costs and increase speed of new product introductions.  

To maintain ones' competitive edge into the future,management's focus must be shifted from systemssophistication to systems Infotegrity. In short, its time to put the "horse before the cart." Information Integrity is no panacea, however, I'm convinced that a company with simple, unsophisticated systems and a high level of Infotegrity will outperform a company that has sophisticated systems and low Infotegrity. What about those company that have both? I buy their stock!

Continuous Improvement Training Program

If you and your company need help in increasing speed, improving quality, eliminating non-value-added cost, and creating a fun work environment, may I suggest my Continuous Improvement Training Program. As a MBBP subscriber you can purchase this training program at a 38% discount. To review the details, take 5-minutes and simply click on the below link

Continuous Improvement Training Program

"ShowTime!" The Manufacturing Simulation Game
MRP vs. Lean Simulation Exercises

ShowTime, the manufacturing simulation game, demonstrates the benefits of pull manufacturing and manufacturing cells (lean Manufacturing) versus push/batch manufacturing. The game compares batch or push manufacturing techniques (traditional manufacturing) to one piece pull manufacturing using sequential production. It shows how quality and productivity improve while reducing WIP inventory, scrap, rework, and floor space required. The game has been designed for 6-8 participants with unlimited observers. It is based upon each participant taking an active role in running a mini-production line where ‘real’ products are manufactured.

Manufacturing Simulation Game

Sharing the Knowledge

You are welcomed to share this bulletin with your team, peers, suppliers and upper management... simply use the “Forward to a Colleague” form that appears at the top of this Web page.