Another way to look at cost-added activities is
to say too much or too many. Too much inventory, too
many set-ups, too much queue, too much material handling, too many
inspections, too many transactions, etc.—they're all cost-added.
More than enough to meet the requirement is cost-added. Now, can you
begin to make a list of all the cost-added activities in your
company?
Now that we've begun to identify the cost-added
activities you might ask how we go about eliminating or at the very
least, significantly reducing these cost-added activities. We have
developed a three-step rule to reducing waste. See Figure 3.
|
Steps
|
Reduction
|
|
1. Reduce by 50%
|
50%
|
|
2. Reduce by 50% again
|
75%
|
|
3. Make it 10% of what it was
|
90%
|
Figure 3. Three-Step Rule for Reducing Waste
First, reduce the waste by 50%. Cut it in half.
This will require fundamental, not superficial, change and
improvement. Next, reduce it by 50% again, and we will have 75% of
the waste eliminated. The last step is to make it 10% of what it
originally was, thus taking out or eliminating 90% of the waste in
the process. Talk about a paradigm shift for reducing waste, for
significant continuous improvement, and for substantially reducing
the long-term cost structure and global competitiveness of a
business!
This 3-step war on waste can be applied anywhere.
It can be applied at home. It can be applied in the community. It
can be applied in government (what an opportunity there!), and it
can be applied in business. Let's take 3 or 4 examples of waste
reduction in a company and walk through the examples and the
process. See Figure 4.
|
Steps
|
Reduction
|
Method
|
|
1. Reduce by 50%
|
50%
|
Separate inside vs. outside exchange of die
|
|
2. Reduce by 50% again
|
75%
|
Eliminate adjustments
|
|
3. Make it 10% of what it was
|
90%
|
Change the process
|
Figure 4. Three-Step Rule for
Reducing Setups SMED
The 3-step rule for reducing set-ups or SMED
(Single Minute Exchange of Die) is an example of how you can cut
set-ups by 90% by taking the cost-added waste out of the set-up.
|
Steps
|
Reduction
|
Method
|
|
1. Reduce by 50%
|
50%
|
Reduce queue time
|
|
2. Reduce by 50% again
|
75%
|
Improve flow
|
|
3. Make it 10% of what it was
|
90%
|
Change the process
|
Figure 5. Three-Step Rule for
Reducing Cycle Time
First, separate the activities that could take
place outside the set-up or change-over from the activities that
absolutely have to take place inside the time the machine is shut
down for set-up or change-over. Watch out now—over half the
activities can be moved outside off line or parallel to the inside
activities. This will cut the set-up time (last good piece—first
good piece) in half. Next, eliminate the adjustments. Eliminate
the waste of first piece inspections and adjustments with each
set-up by fool-proofing the set-up with automatic checks or
failsafing or pokayoke to eliminate the waste of adjustment. The
last step is to look at changing the process.
The 3-step rule for reducing manufacturing
cycle time is an example of how you can cut cycle times by 90% by
taking the cost-added waste out of the cycle time. First, reduce
or eliminate the queue or wait time between operations. Queue time
is generally 50-80% of the total time in a process. It is
cost-added waste. Get rid of it and reduce cycle times by 50%.
Next, work on reducing the cost-added activities of material
handling transportation and distance and improving the flow of
the process, consolidating, moving operations closer together, and
going to a flow versus a functional layout will reduce the cycle
time another 50%. That's a 75% reduction in waste before you even
look at changing the process. Remember 70%-75% of the costs are in
the cost-added activities. See Figure 6.
|
Steps
|
Reduction
|
|
1. Eliminate
|
50%
|
|
2. Consolidate
|
75%
|
|
3. Simplify
|
90%
|
|
4. Automate
|
10%
|
Figure 6. Four-Step Rule for
Automation
Here's a 4-step rule for reducing waste when
thinking about automating any process. Everybody knows by now that
you should never automate a process just as it is. That certainly
is an old paradigm. What we should do is look at the total
process and look for fundamental improvement (not superficial) and
eliminate the waste and improve the process before we
automate.
If you eliminate the cost-added
activities you'll reduce the process by 50%. If you consolidate
the activities that are left you'll reduce the process by
another 50% and if you simplify the remaining activities
you'll end up automating only 10% of the original process. 90%
waste elimination. Again, what a paradigm shift! What a waste! See
Figure 7.
|
Reduction
|
Total Reduction
|
Technique
|
|
1. Reduce by 25%
|
25%
|
MRP
|
|
2. Reduce by 50%
|
50%
|
Class A MRP II
|
|
3. Reduce by 50% again
|
75%
|
JIT
|
|
4. Make it 10% of what it was originally
|
90%
|
World Class
|
Figure 7. Four-Step Rule for
Eliminating Wate on the Journey to World Class
To be Continued
STAY
CONNECTED
To
stay current on bullet-proofed manufacturing solutions, subscribe to
our free
ezine, "The Business Basics and Best Practices Bulletin."
Simply fill in the below form and click on the subscribe button.
We'll
also send you our free
Special Report, "Five Change
Initiatives for Personal and Company Success."
Your
personal information will never
be disclosed to any third party.
Manufacturing
leaders have a responsibility to educate and train their team
members. Help for developing a self-directed, World Class
Manufacturing training program for your people is just a click
away:
http://bbasicsllc.com/training-modules.htm
You
are welcomed to print and share this bulletin with your
manufacturing teams, peers, suppliers and upper management ...
better yet, have them signup for their own copy at:
http://bbasicsllc.com/subscribe.htm
With
the escalating spam-wars, it's also a good idea to WHITELIST
our bulletin mailing domain via your filtering software or
control panel:
bizbasics@getresponse.com
This will help guarantee that your bulletin is never deleted
unexpectedly.
Manufacturing
Knowledge you’ll not find at offsite
seminars nor in the books at Amazon.com
Lean Manufacturing - Balanced Scorecard
ISO 9000:2000 - Strategic Planning - Supply Chain
Management - MRP Vs Lean Exercises - Kaizen Blitz
Lean Six Sigma - Value Stream Mapping
All at one Website: Good
Manufacturing Practices
Lean
Six Sigma Training Thinking
Out of the Box
Balanced
Scorecards Strategic
Tactical Planning
Supply Chain Inventory Management Total
Quality Management Principles
Lean
Manufacturing Implementation Lean
Manufacturing Principles
Email: Click
here Privacy Policy
|