Business Basics
Home Page


Who is Bill Gaw?
And why should we
listen to him?

 


lean manufacturing principles and techniques training

A training program that gains employee understanding and commitment
Lean Manufacturing Training Program

If you want to get to the top of the latter, forward this Web page to your CEO/HR
Mfg. Mgmt. Development Program

Continuous Improvement - Part 3 of 8

Part 1  Part 2   Part 3  Part 4  Part 5  Part 6  Part 7  Part 8



Get Bill Gaw's Lean Manufacturing Book
$15.00 Click Here

 Book: "Back to Basics"

 


privacy policy

987

760-945-5596

Other Training Options:

Lean Sigma Assessment

Lean Six Sigma Implementation

Lean Six Sigma, Certification Program

Lean Six Sigma Forum

Lean Manufacturing Basics

Lean Manufacturing Assessment

Lean Manufacturing Transformation Training

Shop Floor Control

Lean Manufacturing Principles and Techniques

Lean Manufacturing Simulation Game

Lean Manufacturing Certification Program

Lean Manufacturing
Seminars

Kaizen Management Training

Lean Manufacturing Problems and Solutions

Lean Manufacturing Seminar-in-a-Box

Supply Chain Management Training Program

Strategic Planning Training Program

Thinking-Outside-the- Box Workshop

Lean Management PowerPoint Training Modules

Lean Manufacturing
Articles

Lean Manufacturing
Consulting

 

WHY IS THIS A PROBLEM NOW?

ERP packages and their associated brethren have at­tempted to standardize the way to manage information within the corporation. For the most part, they have been successful. These systems have allowed for the replace­ment of many varied homegrown or out-of-date systems that inhibited change and made modernization diffi­cult. The problem is that the proliferation of new sys­tems on the periphery is outstripping the ability of ERP packages to grow and incorporate these various data collection points into a core application that is avail­able for the corporation as a whole.

 

Proliferation is occurring for a number of reasons: (1) it is fairly easy to create a database using MS-Access and many end-users are doing this and avoiding corpo­rate IT; (2) information systems development and de­ployment time has been cut considerably, enabling a new system to be rolled out soon after new requirements are defined; (3) most new hardware comes with a computer system; and (4) business processes are changing at break­neck speed.

 

Mergers and acquisitions have added to the prob­lem because of different cultures and systems that were standard but are now immediately nonstandard. Dis­tance is another element added to the mix. A standard­ization effort that would be fairly straightforward in a single location becomes extremely difficult in multiple locations and with different organizational structures.

The above paragraph argues for standardization and a rational manner of evaluating systems or processes before accepting them into the corporation. Of course each person or group that brought in one of these sys­tems was keen to a key fact—they were bringing in some­thing that was an improvement over the previous way of doing things. Hence, the rub.

As we enter a new century, we are hearing two seem­ingly contradictory terms. One is standardization. This call is being driven by cost, ISO/QS 9000, standardized work instructions, quality, international demands, and technology—to name a few. The second is innovation. This call is being driven by competition, a need for prod­uct and corporate differentiation, and speed—to name a few. These competing demands are similar and related to the old centralization versus decentralization argu­ments of the past.

 

Just as the centralized versus decentralized arguments went, there needs to be a rationalization. Complete de­centralization leads to cost overruns and confusion, while complete centralization leads to slowness and a detachment from the business. One must look at each individual function and decide where it makes sense to perform the task. One of the key success factors is to make sure you keep some of the task local while cen­tralizing the main function. This type of relational man­agement has been in place for years and generally appears to be working.

 

The innovation versus standardization argument needs to mimic the centralization versus decentraliza­tion decision process. You cannot have only innovation or only standardization. There must be a plan in place to make these types of decisions in a rational manner and for the best purposes of the corporation. This plan must have multiple prongs. The decision is too impor­tant to leave to seat-of-the-pants decision making.

Continued

Part 1  Part 2   Part 3  Part 4  Part 5  Part 6  Part 7  Part 8


Bill Gaw's Lean Manufacturing & Six Sigma Bulletin (LMSSB)

To stay current on Lean Manufacturing and Six Sigma knowledge and implementation know-how, subscribe to Bill Gaw's Lean Manufacturing Six Sigma Bulletin and you'll receive his weekly solutions to the reasons why 80% of lean initiatives fail to meet expectations. And as a bonus we'll send you a download copy of our eBook, "Thinking-Outside-the-Box.". (All at no cost of course.).

 Simply fill in your first name and email address and click on the bar below:

        Your personal information will never be disclosed to any third party.

First Name:
Your E-Mail:

Here's what one of our 15,000 plus subscribers wrote about the LMSS Bulletin:

"Great manufacturing articles. Thanks for the insights. I often share portions of your articles with my staff and they too enjoy them and fine aspects where they can integrate points into their individual areas of responsibilities. Thanks again."

               Kerry B. Stephenson. President. KALCO Lighting, LLC


Knowledge and implementation know-how you'll not find in the
books at Amazon.com... neither in the APICS Package 
nor the Harvard Business School Press.  

Business Basics, LLC
6003 Dassia Way, Oceanside, CA 92056
West Coast: 760-945-5596 

© 2000-2013 Business Basics, LLC