Business Basics
Home Page


Who is Bill Gaw?
And why should we
listen to him?

 


lean manufacturing principles and techniques training

Are you worried about your company's future?
Are you concerned about your job security?

Lean Manufacturing Certification

It's easy to present "make-a-difference' in-
house training with the help of our: 
Lean Manufacturing Seminar-in-a-Box

The Balanced Scorecard
Part 2 of 4


privacy policy

To review our training
packages, simply click
on any of the links below:

Training Materials and Options

Lean Manufacturing Solutions

Lean Manufacturing Toolbox

Performance Measurement Training

Poka-Yoke and
Process Improvement Training

Lean Manufacturing -
Small and Medium
Sized Businesses

Supply Chain
Inventory Management

Lean Six Sigma
Implementation

Strategic Planning Training

World Class Manufacturing

Continuous Process Improvement

Kaizen Training

Kaizen Blitz Event

Thinking-Outside-
the-Box

Best-In-Class Manufacturers

Best of Gaw Lean Management Articles

Golf Training Program


PROBLEMS WITH TODAY'S PERFORMANCE MEASURES

4.      The measures may not be equally applicable across the organization. Sometimes, measures may be selected to be used across several similar entities, such as plants within a division, or departments within a plant. Suppose a measure of customer service, such as percentage of orders shipped on time, is chosen. If several departments or plants use this measure, and the group includes make-to-stock as well as make-to-order environments, the level of what constitutes acceptable performance may vary. While it is possible
to set different levels for each unit measured, companies should take care not to view them all as having the same service level requirement.

5. It may be difficult to obtain actual results that can be compared with the performance goals. A reason that companies continue to use some traditional mea­sures, such as labor efficiency, machine utilization, and even percentage of defects, is because they are easy to measure. On the other hand, some newer per­formance objectives that involve customer satisfac­tion or worker involvement or empowerment are more difficult to measure, and we have not yet devel­oped universally accepted measures that can be rou­tinely generated by our measurement systems. As a result, we may attempt to use surrogate measures that often are not acceptable substitutes.

6. Performance measurement systems may lack flexibil­ity, making it difficult to change the measures used. It takes a long time to design comprehensive infor­mation systems. If these systems are to provide the performance measures, they may be difficult to change. Certainly, companies will tend to use the re­sults because of the investment in the system and will tend to discourage the growth of unauthorized re­ports. Many companies have not yet resolved the is­sue of information system flexibility.

 

7.  Present performance measures may stress control, not
improvement.
Present day programs such as TQM and JIT stress continuous improvement. In the past, performance measurement systems tended to stress control around some measurable norm, rather than improvement to some new undefined level of performance. Standard costs, along with their corresponding variances, have been used for control purposes. Today, more companies are using target costs for set­
ting goals for attainment, leaving
standard costs primarily for ac­counting purposes.

 

8.      Many performance measurement systems have no way of distinguishing between the vital few and the trivial many.

   Today, companies place more emphasis on doing the right thing, or choosing the activities that will achieve the
greatest benefits for the company (strategic effectiveness). This is in contrast to doing the thing right (operational efficiency). Measurement systems tend to be indiscriminate among measures: the persons using them must assign priorities to the activities.

 

9.      The persons being measured may not accept the basic concept of performance measurement. While most persons recognize the inevitability, and even desirability, of being measured, they universally want the measures to be fair.   Too often, the individual may feel that they have no in­volvement in the selection of the performance mea­sure or the level of performance deemed acceptable. As a result, there may be lack of congruence on pri­orities and level of emphasis between supervisor and subordinate.

10. Some measures may promote local, or departmen­tal, goals instead of global or company goals. When production departments are measured by labor effi­ciency, they attempt to maximize labor efficiency, and may be less interested in minimizing inventory, al­though an integrated program of inventory manage­ment may be of great benefit to the total company. The blending of cross-functional goals into workable performance measures is an important objective of performance measurement systems.

There are other criticisms of today's performance measures; however, the ones listed above will be the ba­sis for evaluating the applicability of the balanced scorecard approach and how the use of key indicators will be applicable as an interim step in the performance measurement process.

To Be Continued

For balance of this article, click on the below link:

Lean Manufacturing Articles and click on Series 12


STAY CONNECTED

To stay current on Lean Management Basics and Best Practices, subscribe to our weekly MBBP Bulletin... and we'll send you our PowerPoint presentation, "Introduction to Kaizen Based Lean Manufacturing™." All at no cost of course. 

 

First Name:
Your E-Mail:

 Your personal information will never 
be disclosed to any third party.


privacy policy

Here's what one of our 13,000 plus subscribers wrote about the MBBP Newsletter:

"Great manufacturing articles. Thanks for the insights. I often share portions of your articles with my staff and they too enjoy them and fine aspects where they can integrate points into their individual areas of responsibilities. Thanks again."

               Kerry B. Stephenson. President. KALCO Lighting, LLC


"Back to Basics" Training for anyone ... anywhere ... anytime

Business Basics, LLC
6003 Dassia Way, Oceanside, CA 92056
West Coast: 760-945-5596 

© 2001-2009 Business Basics, LLC