Additional Key Observations
• In most companies, the purchasing function
reported to the materials or logistics manager and was on the same
level as the planning manager. (We have subsequently established
the same type of organization.)
• Most companies funnel all purchase orders
through the purchasing group on their way to the supplier. (We
have automated purchase order launching systems, and once the
buyer has established a price and a supplier, the materials
planner can launch all orders direct with no dollar limit approval
required.)
• In all but one company, the materials
function reports through a materials/logistic manager to the plant
manager. While the personnel works quite closely with and are
dedicated to production, they are not integrated into the
manufacturing department. This allows for a focus on maintaining
functional excellence in the planning and purchasing discipline.
• Most companies did not have nonexempt
employees except for clerks and secretaries. (We are still
reviewing that issue. Approximately 50 percent of our personnel
are nonexempt buyers and planners.)
• Most companies have a solid set of
expectations of their master schedulers. They typically are highly
qualified individuals earning $40,000 to $50,000 annually.
• In most cases, the finished goods demand
and supply planning function is the domain of manufacturing
including management of finished goods inventories. Forecasting,
however, remains the function of the business unit, brand manager,
or product manager. (We chose to split the supply-planning and
demand planning function and are now reevaluating this position.)
By February 1991, we had completed visitations
to 12 other companies. As we promised when we initially engaged
our benchmarking partners, we planned a meeting at our plant to
review all our findings. Our thought in doing this was to create a
networking atmosphere that will allow us to build from the new
relationships we had made. In addition to sharing data, we asked
each of the companies to share with others something that was
especially impressive in our meeting with them. This allowed for
not only a learning experience, but also an R+ for the company
doing such an excellent job.
After the initial 12 visits, we decided we had
sufficient data around cost of services and determined we would
focus on engaging companies that could help us with the following
key causes:
• An analysis of the master scheduling function with emphasis
on their roles and responsibilities, job
description, and selection of the individual(s).
• An understanding of how companies work
with vendors to provide invariant materials. It was evident that
several companies focused a good deal of effort in this area
and were very successful at improving the purchased cost value
in a very positive (win/win) manner.
• Learning how other companies approached
requests for price increases. A very positive way we saw was
working with suppliers to improve their process/cost to minimize
or avoid such requests.
In summary, we feel we met and exceeded all the
goals we had at the start of the process. We have now engaged 12
companies in this process. We chose outstanding companies—those
we felt we could learn from and then could use these findings as
part of our continuous improvement process.
Benchmarking Purpose Statement
Purpose: To
benchmark other companies planning/scheduling and materials
purchasing planning staff
In a way that:
• Allows a comparison of planning systems
• Compares ratio of personnel to volume and CAT numbers sold
• Includes organization alignment and reporting
responsibility
• Reviews asset level and management policy
• Outlines positions on MRP II and world class manufacturing
• Reviews cost of services
• Compares training method and content
• Addresses current and future
planning/scheduling and purchasing issues
STAY
CONNECTED
To
stay current on bullet-proofed manufacturing solutions, subscribe to
our free
ezine, "The Business Basics and Best Practices Bulletin."
Simply fill in the below form and click on the subscribe button.
We'll
also send you our free
Special Report, "Five Change
Initiatives for Personal and Company Success."
Your
personal information will never
be disclosed to any third party.
Manufacturing
leaders have a responsibility to educate and train their team
members. Help for developing a self-directed, World Class
Manufacturing training program for your people is just a click
away:
http://bbasicsllc.com/training-modules.htm
You
are welcomed to print and share this bulletin with your
manufacturing teams, peers, suppliers and upper management ...
better yet, have them signup for their own copy at:
http://bbasicsllc.com/subscribe.htm
With
the escalating spam-wars, it's also a good idea to WHITELIST
our bulletin mailing domain via your filtering software or
control panel:
bizbasics@getresponse.com
This will help guarantee that your bulletin is never deleted
unexpectedly.
Manufacturing
Knowledge you’ll not find at offsite
seminars nor in the books at Amazon.com
Lean Manufacturing - Balanced Scorecard
ISO 9000:2000 - Strategic Planning - Supply Chain
Management - MRP Vs Lean Exercises - Kaizen Blitz
Lean Six Sigma - Value Stream Mapping
All at one Website: Good
Manufacturing Practices
Lean
Six Sigma Consulting World
Class Manufacturing
Balanced
Scorecards Strategic
Tactical Planning
Supply Chain Inventory Management Principles
of Total Quality Management
Manufacturing
Process Improvement
Email: Click
here Privacy Policy
|