WINNING OR LOSING
CUSTOMER ORDERS
Markets consist of customers, and customers buy from suppliers
through
ordering mechanisms. In their buying process, customers consider two
sets of criteria:
*
order qualifiers—These are the criteria that the customer implicitly
or explicitly applies to decide whether a vendor will be considered
as a valid supplier for his procurement purpose. The APICSDictio
nary,
8th
edition, describes order qualifiers as "those competitive
characteristics that a firm
must exhibit to be a viable competitor in
the marketplace. For
example, a firm may seek to compete on char
acteristics other than price, but in order to qualify to
compete, its
costs and the related price must
be within a certain range to be con
sidered by its customers."
*
order winners—These are the criteria that the customer implicitly
or explicitly applies to decide which supplier will be the one that
will be given the order for
delivery of products or services. The
APICS Dictionary, 8th edition, describes order winners
as "those
competitive characteristics
that cause a firm's customers to choose
that firm's products and services over those of its competitors. Or
der winners can be considered to be competitive advantage of
the
firm. Order winners usually
focus on one (rarely more than two) of
the following strategic
initiatives: price/cost, quality, delivery speed,delivery
reliability, product design, flexibility, aftermarket
service, and image."
Though these definitions are certainly nice from a theoretical
point of view, it is often reasonably difficult to get
a clear and
objective picture on these criteria in the real
world.
Evidence shows that more often than not, people internal
to the firm—including
most sales and account managers—do
not have a clear view of the order qualifiers and
winners! It is our experience that, when careful analysis is
done of actual customer order buying criteria and of customer
buying pattern interviewing, the resulting order winners/qualifiers
are often quite different from what sales, marketing, and account
managers thought about them.
So, our advice is not to automatically accept the perceived
order winner and order qualifying criteria that
people from the firm define.
Instead:
• Ask the customer directly. There are, however a few
hidden problems with this
approach in that it may not
be easy to determine who
should be the interviewer
(one from the firm or an
external person) and who
should be your interviewee in the customer organization (the purchasing
manager, or the buyer, or someone else, or all of the above).
In setting up
customer interviews to figure out order winners and
qualifiers, careful planning
should include discussion and decision-making
on these aspects. Another issue is the technique to be used
to identify these order winners
and qualifiers. The problem is that a
buyer—at
the outset—always wants all criteria satisfied at very high
performance levels. What we need to find out, however, is which of
these criteria is really top priority. Although there exist very
sophisticated
statistical techniques to obtain a ranking among a large set
of criteria, resolving ranking conflicts in the process, there is a
very
simple but quite effective technique that you can use. Write all
possible
criteria on cards in a card deck, give it to the interviewee, and
ask him/her to put the most important ones (e.g., no more than five)
on one side.
That allows you then to dig deeper in these criteria
quite rapidly.
• Analyze customer orders won
and prospects lost over the recent past
and deduce from them
what made you win or lose the order. This can
be very powerful if done
well. As a result you obtain the order quali
fiers and winners for a
large set of real customer orders. This allows
you to search for
clusters of orders that all have identical or very
comparable order winning
and order qualifying criteria. And that is
exactly what we are
looking for, as these clusters are the basis for
analyzing how supply chains can be focused on specific customer
expectations. One
drawback of this approach is that it only picks up
information from the
past. Therefore it should be limited to the re
cent past and combined
with customer interviews in order to validate
that the findings are in
line with future developments.
To Be Continued