|
Introduction
This paper is a case study. The subject matter is the implementation
of a concept called "the planner/buyer." The implementation took
place at a metal fabrication facility located in the Northeast.
As indicated by its name, the planner/buyer is an organizational
position within which a person is challenged with the functions of
planning and buying for a defined family of items or, perhaps, a
complete product. Planning may be very wide or narrow in scope and
includes responsibilities such as inventory management, supplier
scheduling, shop floor scheduling, or establishment of ordering
policies. Buying can also be varying in scope. Some companies may
limit the position to supplier scheduling and/or follow-up. Other
companies may expand the responsibilities to include sourcing and
price negotiating.
The balance of this paper will describe not only how the
implementation of the concept took place, but also how the
planner/buyer position was used as a tool in the development of the
people involved.
The Setting
The settingis a small metal fabrication plant that produces ASME-coded
pressure vessels, to order. (Throughout the balance of this paper
this company will be referred to as Company G.) Each end item is
different even though there are many similarities in the components
and the process. At the time of the implementation the plant was
selling about $24 million per year in product. The plant is part of
a larger, international corporation that deals in industrial gases
and chemicals. The parent sells about $3 billion per year.
The plant's materials management department was organized in a
traditional fashion. There was a master scheduler who fed top level
demand into a formal MRP system. Planners turned the MRP output into
shop floor releases and purchase requisitions. Purchasing turned the
requisitions into purchase orders and placed the business with the
suppliers. Shop Floor Control prioritized work in the plant and
provided feedback to the planning functions.
So many times "necessity is the mother of invention." Such was also
the case with Company G. Faced with declining sales, the plant
sought to cut overhead through a reduction in hourly and salary
headcount. Operating the business at reduced staffing meant
eliminating as much non-value-added activity as possible. It also
highlighted the need for multi-skilled people, rather than
specialists. These were all conditions that fueled the need for the
planner/buyers, but there was one equally important reason for
making the change. The materials management organization was a
burden to its customer, Manufacturing.
Manufacturing is the customer of all support organizations;
Materials Management in particular was not treating its customer
very well with its organization of specialists. The simple question
of when material was going to be available caused manufacturing
supervisors many headaches. Their search for the answer took them
to far too many people.
You may be familiar with comments such as:
"Engineering has not released the prints. Go see the Engineer."
"The prints were released last week. Go see the bill of material
clerk."
"The bills are complete. Go see if the master scheduler has released
the assembly orders."
"Those orders were released. Go see the planner."
"Oh yea, I cut a requisition for those two days ago. Go see
Purchasing."
" I know that those parts came in by air freight last night. Go see
shop floor control."
"Those parts are here, but I can't release them until I get a
manufacturing order. Go see the planner."
It had become painfully clear that Manufacturing needed a single
point of contact for their information and that the headcount
reduction was creating the need for multi-skilled people. We needed
planner/buyers.
Developing the Planner/Buyer Position
The planner/buyer position at Company G was developed around its
needs and its environment. As the needs and environments of other
companies change, so may the configuration of the planner/buyer.
Some of the major considerations in establishing a planner/buyer
position are as follows. We will discuss each one:
1. Put speed into the process by eliminating hand-offs.
2. Reduce the points of contact for customers.
3. Improve administrative productivity.
4. Establish clear ownership of responsibility, accountability.
5. Provide authority to those doing the work.
To be Continued
STAY
CONNECTED
To
stay current on manufacturing
competitive knowledge,
please subscribe to our weekly bulletin, "Manufacturing. Basics
and Best Practices (MBBP)." Simply
fill in the below form and click on the " subscribe
button."
We'll
also send you our Special Report, "6-Change Initiatives for
Personal and Company Success."
All at
no cost of course.
Your
personal information will never
be disclosed to any third party.
privacy policy
Here's
what one of our subscribers said about the MBBP Bulletin:
"Great
articles. Thanks for the insights. I often share portions of your
articles with my staff and they too enjoy them and fine aspects
where they can integrate points into their individual areas of
responsibilities. Thanks again."
Kerry B. Stephenson. President. KALCO Lighting, LLC
Lean Manufacturing Menu
Lean
Manufacturing Improvement
Performance
Management Improvement
ISO 9000:2000
Improvement
Continuous
Process Improvement
Value Steam
Mapping Improvement
Strategic
Planning Improvement
Supply
Chain Management Improvement
"Back
to Basics" Training for anyone ... anywhere ... anytime
Business
Basics, LLC
6003 Dassia Way, Oceanside, CA 92056
West Coast: 760-945-5596
© 2001-2007 Business Basics, LLC
|