|
Strategic Planning and implications
Strategic planning is the development of a course
of action designed to optimize a company's position over a long
horizon. Strategic planning is a process covering many variables and
unknowns in the near term and longer term. Some decisions that may
result from the process could involve large capital investments
and how they will be financed. Certainly, decisions such as these
have very important future consequences hence, management often
avoids too many eggs in one basket to minimize risk.
In the area of manufacturing facilities and
equipment, American Industry has often so tightly rationed capital
that it has lost its competitive advantage. This is a very complex
problem and cannot be fully explored in this paper. However,
conventional wisdom, fear of error, shortsighted views, and obsolete
measurement systems are all contributing factors. In addition,
some manufacturing conglomerates are so involved with financial
magic through acquisition that severe capital shortages and/or
neglect result. For most, this is clearly chasing the wrong rabbit
if World Class Manufacturing is (as it should be) a high priority.
A Missing Link
Strategic planning has become one of those in vogue or
fashionable terms which has taken a prominent position on the list
of management lingo over the last few years. Our business schools
pound the term into MBA candidates' heads. Mounds of literature on
the subject have been published emphasizing marketing and finance
with manufacturing only mentioned in passing, if at all, in a large
percentage of cases. Consulting firms, specializing in strategic
planning have sprung up all over the place, often creating more new
terms, diagrams, panaceas, etc. including inexperienced (and
expensive) MBAs counseling America's boardrooms on future direction.
Few of these consulting specialists have shop floor experience so
they often fail to recognize the important correlation of
manufacturing, other than in very broad terms, in developing overall
corporate strategy.
Wickham Skinner was one of the first in noting
manufacturing as a missing link in corporate strategy. In describing
a pattern for failure, he wrote:
An examination of top management perceptions of
manufacturing has led me to some notions about basic causes of
many production problems. In each of six industries I have
studied, I have found top executives delegating excessive amounts
of manufacturing policy to subordinates, avoiding involvement in
most production matters, and failing to ask the right questions
until their companies are in obvious trouble. This pattern seems
to be due to a combination of two factors:
1. A sense of personal inadequacy, on the part
of top executives in managing production. (Often the feeling
evolves from a tendency to regard the area as a technical
engineering specialty, or a mundane nuts and bolts segment of
management.)
2. A lack of awareness among top executives
that a production system inevitably involves tradeoffs and
compromises and so it must be designed to perform a limited task
well, with that task defined by corporate strategic objectives.
The first factor is, of course, dependent in
part on the second, for the sense of inadequacy would not be felt
if the strategic role of production were clearer. The second
factor is the one we shall concentrate on in the remainder of this
article.
Like a building, a vehicle, or a boat, a
production system can be designed to do some things well, but
always at the expense of other abilities. It appears to be the
lack of recognition of these tradeoffs and their effects on a
corporation's ability to compete that leads top management to
delegate often-critical decisions to lower, technically oriented
staff levels and to allow policy to be made through apparently
unimportant operating decisions.
It has taken many years for these insights to be
duly recognized and unfortunately, we still have not fully corrected
the problem source. In the same article he describes, with some very
insightful precision, top management's shortsighted views:
The fact is that manufacturing is seen by most
top managers as requiring involved technical skills and a morass
of petty daily decisions and details. It is seen by many young
managers as the gateway to grubby routine, where days are filled
with high pressure, packed with details, and limited to low-level
decision making—all of which is out of the sight and minds of
top level executives. In total, a manufacturing career is
generally perceived as an all-consuming, technically oriented,
hectic life that minimizes one's chances of ever reaching the top
and maximizes the chances of being buried in minutiae.
In fact, these perceptions are not wholly inaccurate. It is
the thesis of this article that the technically oriented concept
of manufacturing is all too prevalent; and that it is largely
responsible for the typically limited contribution manufacturing
makes to a corporation's arsenal of competitive weapons, for
manufacturing's failure to attract the top talent it needs and
should have, and for its failure to attract more young managers with
general management interests and broad abilities. In my opinion,
manufacturing is generally perceived in the wrong way at the top,
managed in f the wrong way at the plant
level, and taught in the wrong ,'v way in the business schools.
STAY
CONNECTED
To
stay current on bullet-proofed manufacturing solutions, subscribe to
our free
ezine, "The Business Basics and Best Practices Bulletin."
Simply fill in the below form and click on the subscribe button.
We'll
also send you our free
Special Report, "Five Change
Initiatives for Personal and Company Success."
Your
personal information will never
be disclosed to any third party.
Manufacturing
leaders have a responsibility to educate and train their team
members. Help for developing a self-directed, World Class
Manufacturing training program for your people is just a click
away:
http://bbasicsllc.com/training-modules.htm
You
are welcomed to print and share this bulletin with your
manufacturing teams, peers, suppliers and upper management ...
better yet, have them signup for their own copy at:
http://bbasicsllc.com/subscribe.htm
With
the escalating spam-wars, it's also a good idea to WHITELIST
our bulletin mailing domain via your filtering software or
control panel:
bizbasics@getresponse.com
This will help guarantee that your bulletin is never deleted
unexpectedly.
Manufacturing
Knowledge you’ll not find at offsite
seminars nor in the books at Amazon.com
Lean Manufacturing - Balanced Scorecard
ISO 9000:2000 - Strategic Planning - Supply Chain
Management - MRP Vs Lean Exercises - Kaizen Blitz
Lean Six Sigma - Value Stream Mapping
All at one Website: Good
Manufacturing Practices
COMPETITIVE
KNOWLEDGE MENU
(Click on any subject below):
Your
company can reach its full potential in all aspects of the business.
All you need is the right knowledge and training. You will find much
of it it here, at the Business Basics' Website:
Lean
Manufacturing Articles
CKN
Article Archives
MB&BP
Bulletin Archives
The
Kaizen Blitz
"ShowTime!"
The MRP vs Lean Mfg. Exercises
At
Your-Company" Workshops and Forums
Popular
Manufacturing Links
Competitive
e-Knowledge for anyone ... anywhere ... anytime
Business Basics, LLC
6003 Dassia Way,
Oceanside, CA 92056
West Coast: 760-945-5596
|